Book Reviews

From Global Warming Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The New Climate War – The Fight to Take Back Our Planet

Author: Michael E. Mann
Published: January 2021
Review by: Robert Cordingley

Michael Mann, a distinguished professor of atmospheric science and much applauded climate crisis fighter, published his book The New Climate War, just as we were transitioning to a new White House administration. While the impact on US policies on climate took a big hit in the previous four years, we can now be hopeful that the country can pursue sensible policies based on the best available science. At the core of Mann’s message is also hope, hope that the ‘inactivists’, those who oppose any action on climate change, will fail to stop us falling over a tipping point in public opinion and consciousness and make the feasible and necessary systemic changes in policy to solve the basic problem.

For example, he argues that proponents of individual action (“it’s our fault and not the fossil fuel industry’s”) can be a distraction from the systemic changes we need.

On doomism, he notably contextualizes the physical tipping points to a runaway climate warming via methane hydrates and permafrost methane release are real but operate over centuries or even millennia.

He argues that the environmentalists debate over carbon pricing is largely artificial being the result of deliberate and divisive messaging by others.

Mann delivers a blow by blow account of the disingenuous ways, for example, Koch and the fossil fuel industry have fought against renewable energy and anything that might threaten their profits. He speaks from the front lines, suffering personal attacks and brickbats on his own scientific work. He highlights politicians working in their legislatures to discredit renewable energy. He dissects the campaigns of dis- and mis-information designed to cause rifts in the environmental movement.

I found the book a lively and easy read with his clear writing and a measure of wit. The book is a must read for climate crisis activists to understand the deliberate strategies inactivists have followed in, as he puts it, the Ds: disinformation, deceit, divisiveness, deflection, delay, despair-mongering and doomism. He names names with abandon, in the media, in industry and among those who think the problem is too big for us to make a difference and those that might hijack the climate fight for other causes. The final chapter provides a down-to-earth blueprint on how we can fight back on the inactivists' propaganda. It has been all about the ‘D’ messaging and we need to call it out for what it is.

Half-Earth, Our Planet’s Fight for Life

Author: Edward O. Wilson
Published: March 2016
Review by: Jean Darling

Overview

Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life (2016) is Pulitzer Prize-winning author, biologist, and environmental advocate Edward O. Wilson’s in-depth look at the planetary threat of mass extinction, known as the Sixth Extinction, taking place at humanity’s own hands.

The current rate of extinction is nearly 1,000 times higher than during the pre-human era, and traditional conservation movements will not work fast enough to save the natural world. However, Wilson argues that there is still time to save up to 85% of Earth’s biodiversity. His solution: Devote half of the planet’s surface to nature preserves. The book is divided into three parts: a discussion of the source of the problem; an analysis of the interconnectedness, complexity, and richness of living organisms and their ecosystems; and Wilson’s solution for saving the remaining wildlands and stabilizing all of life’s future.

In Part 1

Wilson discusses the source of the problem at hand: Human-driven activities are causing species populations to decline and increasing the rate of extinctions. There have only been five other geologically recorded mass extinction events during Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history. After the most recent such event, the planet took around 10 million years to recover.

In a flash of geological time, humans are transforming the habitats, climate, and the very ground that we walk on, resulting in geologists, as well as Wilson, arguing for the age we live in to be called the “Anthropocene.”

Wilson’s contention is that humanity’s short-sightedness and inflated sense of self is the driving force behind these extinctions.

Some individuals—new conservationists and anthropocentrists among them—believe that humanity’s rule over nature is preordained and that we should accept our supreme status over all other living organisms. This small but growing group of individuals believes that humans should dominate the planet and the surviving species and ecosystems are conserved based on their usefulness to humanity.

To Wilson, this idea is wrong and shameful. He reminds readers that we, like other organisms, are biological creatures. Humans are part of the biosphere and not above it. Through Part 1, Wilson hopes to show the urgency and magnitude of the problem at hand.

In Part 2

Provides a naturalistic portrait of the surviving biosphere. Wilson pays tribute to organisms both large and small. This is a conscious decision because, according to him, most of the public and scientists do not understand the full breadth of biodiversity. In fact, scientists have only documented about 20% of the natural world to the species level.

Wilson illustrates the interconnectedness of living species within their ecosystems and how extinguishing one species has ramifications throughout the web of life. Because the natural world is poorly understood, we do not have a full grasp of the true impact of extinctions. The aim of these chapters is to help readers see the value of nature and to realize that losing this beauty is unacceptable.

In Part 3

Wilson offers his solution. Traditional conservation movements, which focus on saving the most endangered species and habitats, are not moving fast enough. To combat the magnitude of the problem at hand, there needs to be a solution just as enormous.

Wilson argues that this solution is to designate one half of the planet’s surface as a natural reserve.

The digital and economic revolutions, more information in one place and available on computers, sustainable economies, occurring now have already begun to reduce our ecological footprint.

If humans can stabilize (and eventually decrease) our population and shift from viewing ourselves as rulers of nature to seeing ourselves as its stewards, then Wilson thinks we will be able to save most of Earth’s remaining biodiversity. The book talks about Earth’s rich and unique biodiversity and a lamentation for the life that human activities are extinguishing. To Wilson, humanity stands at a crossroads: We can continue down our destructive path, which will have catastrophic and far-reaching consequences for the planet, or we can work together to save the remaining biodiversity. The choice, according to Wilson, is obvious. He is also optimistic that humans will chose to conserve life, creating a sustainable future for all.