Difference between revisions of "Scientific Journal Publications"
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Jacobson(2019)|<em>Impacts of Green New Deal Energy Plans on Grid Stability, Costs, Jobs, Health, and Climate in 143 Countries</em>, Jacobson (2019)]] [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.12.003|link] | [[Jacobson(2019)|<em>Impacts of Green New Deal Energy Plans on Grid Stability, Costs, Jobs, Health, and Climate in 143 Countries</em>, Jacobson (2019)]] [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.12.003|link] | ||
− | <br/>Summary: This paper looks at a high level world model of an electric grid, and the resources needed | + | <br/>Summary: This paper looks at a high level world model of an wind, water, and sunlight only electric grid, and the resources needed for 80% by 2030, and 100% by 2050. |
[[Jacobson(2017)|<em>100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World"</em>, Jacobson (2017)]] [https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/CountriesWWS.pdf|link] | [[Jacobson(2017)|<em>100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World"</em>, Jacobson (2017)]] [https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/CountriesWWS.pdf|link] | ||
<br/>Summary: | <br/>Summary: | ||
− | |||
[[Jacobson(2015)|<em>100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States</em>, Jacobson (2015)]] [https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/USStatesWWS.pdf|link] | [[Jacobson(2015)|<em>100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States</em>, Jacobson (2015)]] [https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/USStatesWWS.pdf|link] | ||
− | <br/>Summary: | + | <br/>Summary: This paper looks at a medium granularity US model of 100% wind, water, and sunlight only electric grid. The paper identifies the amount of resources needed, and some novel technologies. The resource model is somewhat general and is a base to improve upon. |
[[Clark(2017)|<em>Evaluation of Jacobson's proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar, Clark (2017)]][https://www.pnas.org/content/114/26/6722|link] | [[Clark(2017)|<em>Evaluation of Jacobson's proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar, Clark (2017)]][https://www.pnas.org/content/114/26/6722|link] |
Revision as of 16:45, 30 March 2020
Contents
Scientific Journal Publications
This section contains publications from scientific peer reviewed journals that are applicable to climate disruption.
Climate Change Modeling
<Insert articles here>
Renewable Electric Grid Modeling
Impacts of Green New Deal Energy Plans on Grid Stability, Costs, Jobs, Health, and Climate in 143 Countries, Jacobson (2019) [1]
Summary: This paper looks at a high level world model of an wind, water, and sunlight only electric grid, and the resources needed for 80% by 2030, and 100% by 2050.
100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World", Jacobson (2017) [2]
Summary:
100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States, Jacobson (2015) [3]
Summary: This paper looks at a medium granularity US model of 100% wind, water, and sunlight only electric grid. The paper identifies the amount of resources needed, and some novel technologies. The resource model is somewhat general and is a base to improve upon.
Evaluation of Jacobson's proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar, Clark (2017)[4]
Summary: A paper with constructive criticism of Jacobson's 2015 US WWS paper. Modeling areas that can be improved are identified.