Difference between revisions of "Hydrogen Hub Act Issues"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "=== Hydrogen Hub bill discussion draft of 11-12-21 – Tom Solomon’s comments=== Overall, this is a fossil blue hydrogen bill. * It defines ‘clean hydrogen’ to allow...") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[Category:Industry]][[Category:Problem]] | ||
=== Hydrogen Hub bill discussion draft of 11-12-21 – Tom Solomon’s comments=== | === Hydrogen Hub bill discussion draft of 11-12-21 – Tom Solomon’s comments=== | ||
| Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
* It defines ‘clean hydrogen’ to allow huge emissions of CO2. | * It defines ‘clean hydrogen’ to allow huge emissions of CO2. | ||
| − | * It explicitly allows Enhanced Oil Recovery in Section 5.b, which is not a climate solution. | + | * It explicitly allows [[Enhanced Oil Recovery]] in Section 5.b, which is not a climate solution. |
* It relies on the false premise that hydrogen is a low emissions fuel which it is not. | * It relies on the false premise that hydrogen is a low emissions fuel which it is not. | ||
* It supplies major tax subsidies to blue hydrogen production, which end up being fossil fuel subsidies. | * It supplies major tax subsidies to blue hydrogen production, which end up being fossil fuel subsidies. | ||
* It prevents green hydrogen produced from fresh water (but may allow green hydrogen produced from brackish water, if that is feasible.) | * It prevents green hydrogen produced from fresh water (but may allow green hydrogen produced from brackish water, if that is feasible.) | ||
| − | Comments on the draft bill itself: | + | <!-- Comments on the draft bill itself: |
# The underlying premise of the bill is flawed, i.e. that hydrogen is a low emissions fuel, which it is not. Section 3. Hydrogen Hub Act – Standards defines ‘clean hydrogen’ to allow huge emissions of CO2, but still qualify as clean. This is how: | # The underlying premise of the bill is flawed, i.e. that hydrogen is a low emissions fuel, which it is not. Section 3. Hydrogen Hub Act – Standards defines ‘clean hydrogen’ to allow huge emissions of CO2, but still qualify as clean. This is how: | ||
| Line 91: | Line 92: | ||
“carbon intensity” means the quantity of carbon dioxide-equivalent produced at the site of production per kilogram of hydrogen produced, expressed in grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per megajoule; | “carbon intensity” means the quantity of carbon dioxide-equivalent produced at the site of production per kilogram of hydrogen produced, expressed in grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per megajoule; | ||
| + | |||
| + | --> | ||
Latest revision as of 02:33, 20 February 2024
Hydrogen Hub bill discussion draft of 11-12-21 – Tom Solomon’s comments
Overall, this is a fossil blue hydrogen bill.
- It defines ‘clean hydrogen’ to allow huge emissions of CO2.
- It explicitly allows Enhanced Oil Recovery in Section 5.b, which is not a climate solution.
- It relies on the false premise that hydrogen is a low emissions fuel which it is not.
- It supplies major tax subsidies to blue hydrogen production, which end up being fossil fuel subsidies.
- It prevents green hydrogen produced from fresh water (but may allow green hydrogen produced from brackish water, if that is feasible.)
